The more we know, the more complex it looks

The brain, and not just ours, has always been seen as a tremendously complex machine. As we improve our ways to look at it we get more and more information on its working, however rather than shedding light on the way it actually manages to perform all its diverse activities we pile up more and more questions anf the complexity increases.
We have had interesting results in the understanding of how a brain forms memories and access to them, we understood that memories are about circuits that forms, whose neurones are actually part of many circuits and therefore of many memories, that synapses strengthen their bindings when we learn and when we "store" a memory and so on. All this knowledge has been backed up by experiments and yet the overall understanding of memory formation, storage and retrieval is far from being clear.
As scientists and researchers work on getting more information to finally shed light on this we get more understanding of what is going on but this does not get us any nearer to the goal. It is just making the whole picture more complex, like a fractal. In a fractal picture you see the overall pattern, and then you want to get more details and the result is to have a more complex pattern and so on in a never ending story.
That was the thought I had when reading of a new discovery made by scientists at John Hopkins hospital: neurones involved in memory (and, possibly, many others) do something tricky and potentially dangerous, they change their DNA!
The strengthening of synaptic junctions requires the production of specific proteins and these are controlled by genes in the DNA of the neurone. Genes are blueprint providing instructions to build a protein. These instructions are brought by mRNA into the Endoplasmic Reticulum in the cytoplasm where ribosomes assembled the requires amino acids. A gene contains plenty of instructions and the selection of the right ones is made by regulatory tags attached to cytosine base in the DNA. 
It turns out that the neurone depending on the activities performed (which are the result of signals received by its dendrites) changes these tags thus changing the way proteins will be produced, eventually changing the synaptic strengthening.
Another tile of the puzzle is surfacing but the overall puzzle has just become a bit more complex!

About Roberto Saracco

Roberto Saracco fell in love with technology and its implications long time ago. His background is in math and computer science. Until April 2017 he led the EIT Digital Italian Node and then was head of the Industrial Doctoral School of EIT Digital up to September 2018. Previously, up to December 2011 he was the Director of the Telecom Italia Future Centre in Venice, looking at the interplay of technology evolution, economics and society. At the turn of the century he led a World Bank-Infodev project to stimulate entrepreneurship in Latin America. He is a senior member of IEEE where he leads the New Initiative Committee and co-chairs the Digital Reality Initiative. He is a member of the IEEE in 2050 Ad Hoc Committee. He teaches a Master course on Technology Forecasting and Market impact at the University of Trento. He has published over 100 papers in journals and magazines and 14 books.